Statement On Notices Of Termination By Tony Tyler

Cathay Pacific Airways confirms that three of its pilots were today given notices of termination of employment. All three individuals were terminated in accordance with their Conditions of Service and the Hong Kong Employment Ordinance.

Under their Conditions of Service, an officer`s employment may be terminated at any time by either the company or the officer giving not less than three month`s written notice, or payment in lieu of notice, to the other party. The officers will be paid three month`s wages in lieu of notice with effect from today`s date.

The company is mindful of the seriousness of these actions and wishes to stress that it has not taken these decisions lightly.
The first case involved a First Officer with eight years of employment history in the airline. The company exercised its right to terminate his contract of employment following a review of his past employment record with the company. Such a review was triggered, in part, by a recent incident concerning flight CX883 from Vancouver to Hong Kong. A number of factors relating to the officer`s employment record, including a recent warning letter on his file, were taken into account when reaching the decision to terminate the officer. In simple terms the company has lost confidence in the employee. We are aware that the officer concerned is a member of the HKAOA.

The second case involved a First Officer with five years of employment with the airline. His employment has been terminated following a detailed investigation of a recent incident in which he was found to have presented himself for a flight in circumstances which were in serious breach of the company`s Approved Flight Time Limitations Scheme. The officer had not allowed himself sufficient rest before reporting for duty. We believe that the officer concerned is not a member of the HKAOA.

The third case involved a Captain with 11 years employment in Cathay Pacific. The officer failed to report for duty for a Cathay Pacific flight, CX883 from Los Angeles to Hong Kong on 2 July, despite having received two notices from the company requiring him to do so. The officer failed to provide a satisfactory reason for failing to report for duty. Such conduct is considered a serious breach of his Conditions of Service. We are aware the officer concerned is a member of the HKAOA.